NIL Free-For-All

After the Alston case held the NCAA rule prohibiting student athletes from accepting compensation for use of their name, image and likeness, (NIL), to be in violation of federal anti-trust laws, college athletic departments held their collective breath. What would the NCAA do now? The answer was not much. The best the NCAA could do…

Read More

HOLLYWOOD DILEMMA: COURT RULES A PRODUCT CREATED BY AI IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR COPYRIGHT PROTECTION

A federal district court in Washington D.C. has just concluded that a piece of visual artautonomously created by a computer algorithm is not eligible for copyright protection becauseit lacked human authorship. Stephen Thaler sought to register for copyright a picture generatedby a computer program, naming the machine as the author and seeking transfer of thecopyright…

Read More

IS THE PRODUCT OF AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ALGORITHM “SPEECH” AND ENTITLED TO PROTECTION UNDER THE FIRST AMENDMENT?

This question is certain to arise in many contexts but is particularly relevant in the area of copyright law.  The laws of copyright were written to protect human creative content in books, songs, photographs, etc.  A common defense to copyright infringement, (of a song for example), is that the offending product is a new “work”…

Read More